re: Michael Palevitz

Date: Fri Jan 28 2000 - 00:39:44 EST

  • Next message: "re: Michael Palevitz"

    Just my humble two cents: <br>
    Palevitz said: <br>
    Sure, <br>
    > Behe is coy enough (and a tad disingenuous) to avoid calling his designer <br>
    > God, but that\'s consistent with recent creationist strategy. Having failed <br>
    > to convince the Supreme Court that \"scientific creationism\" is science, <br>
    > they now package it as \"intelligent design theory.\"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 28 2000 - 00:39:50 EST