Re: Especially for Bertvan
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 10:15:12 EDT

Cliff writes:

<< Bertvan, it's not clear what you're objecting to. Neo-Darwinists seem
chary of macroevolutionary notions, whether out of prejudice against theories
that lack direct fossil evidence, or out of concern about creationism. You
to think that macroevolution cannot occur within the context of RM&NS. Why
not? >>

Maybe it's not a question of whether macroevolution can or cannot occur
within the context of RM&NS. Perhaps the question is whether RM&NS
are sufficient cause for macroevolution. To help answer this question,
perhaps you can provide the single most impressive example of
evolutionary change via RM&NS that is well founded in observation and