RE: view from Kansas on that evolution debate

Pim van Meurs (
Sat, 2 Oct 1999 11:13:53 -0700

SJ: But he seems to suffer from the same Darwinist delusion that because "the
evidence supporting the mechanism of [micro-] evolution is empirical and
proven", the same mechanisms must be responsible for "macro-evolution".
Even though the observational evidence for "speciation and natural history"
are "admittedly weaker":

Nice ad hominem Stephen. Or at least by your definition of ad hominem. "Darwinist delusion"...

You have yet to explain why you are not suffering from a delusion? And yet without any evidence you do accuse others of being delusive?