RE: Wall Street Journal: The Church of Darwin By Phillip E. Johnson

Pim van Meurs (
Thu, 19 Aug 1999 19:12:49 -0700

SJ: Darwinism is now in *deep* trouble because: a) its philosophical
assumptions are being exposed; and b) its evidentiary claims are
seen to be weak.

You are confusing philosophy with science Stephen. A common problem among some 'creationists' on this reflector. And its evidentiary claims are quite strong. Which is why creationists won't deal with them in a scientific manner/

SJ: Needless to say, the ID movement has arrived at centre-stage!

And still is not impressing too many people. After all ID has nothing to add to science. Dembski has shown how natural selection falls under the concept of ID.