>Hold off a sec in your rant. It seems perfectly okay to me to pick the
>oldest valid dating method of the three and characterize them by that one to
>establish the inability to date MORE than that. I'm sure he does indeed know
>c-14 is only good to 10k yrs back, but uranium series and dendrochronology
>allow dating much older.
I do apologize for that. I was getting irritated and went overboard. Sorry!
Life is short, but it's also very wide.