Reply to Brian Harper
Thu, 27 May 1999 14:59:28 -0400 (EDT)

Hi Y'all!

Brian Harper wrote:
Since you choose to remain anonymous, then you should refrain from making allegations that you cannot sustain in view of said anonymity. Surely you don't expect anyone to accept without evidence spectacular claims from an anonymous source.

My comments:
Why would I lie about something that, as you point out, I cannot prove without compromising my anonymity? Why would I deliberately put myself in a position that would damage my credibility unless I was telling the truth? If you cannot accept my word as a fellow Brother in Christ, what possible evidence could I provide that you would accept? You would still have to decide whether to accept my word they were not forgeries or falfisied, so why not save yourself the trouble and simply accept that what I have said is true without proof? Or have you already decided that you will accept nothing that I say as true?

Brian Harper wrote:
Please, share with us this overwhelming evidence which your department chair hopes never gets published.

I already have in general. It's irreducible complexity. I even gave a couple of examples, but you appear to dismissed it because you couldn't understand it. See my posting this weekend on the bombardier beetle, then if you have any questions please ask them instead of dismissing it all out of hand.
FREE! The World's Best Email Address
Reserve your name now at