This is not true according to Behe's definition of irreducible complexity.
>Rich Daniel inquired:
>Have you read http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/behe.html?
>I have; it's utter crap, and that's putting it mildly. A couple of
brain-dead know-nothings who don't understand the subject they are trying
to "critique" (hatchet-job would be a better description). If they think
they can refute Behe, why don't they published their "results" in
peer-reviewed journals like Behe has?
I don't believe Behe has published his critique in peer reviewed journals.