RE: Evolution: dead man walking

Pim van Meurs (
Tue, 6 Apr 1999 20:43:47 -0700

Cummins: Secondly, the scientific data does not support the Big Bang. Just about
everything about the Big Bang model is in contradiction with known
scientific facts.

Your ignorance is only surpassed by your inability to support your views.

Cummins: Explosions in an isolated system don't organize (2nd law
thermo), gravity would have prevented expansion, etc.

Within isolated systems organization can take place. Please explain why gravity should have prevented expansion.

Cummins: And the few pieces of circumstantial evidence that the Big Bang is based can be explained by other means (e.g. background radiation is just diffused energy from stars). And,
there's a mountain of circumstantial evidence which contradicts the Big Bang
(e.g. lack of anti-matter in the universe).

I am amazed at your lack of understanding of this topic.
CumminsL Once upon a time there was a guy named Darwin. He wrote a book about how
creatures changed and became other creatures through the generations. He
recognized that to be scientific that he needed to provide ways to test this
idea. Thus, he proposed a number of tests. Today, Evolution has failed
just about all of his tests.

More ignorance dear Cummins ? Please show us what tests he came up with and show us how evolution failed these test.

Your display of ignorance is amazing. That you use it to attack something you do not understand is even more appaling. But it does explain your use of ad hominems.