RE: Evolution's Imperative

Pim van Meurs (
Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:01:54 -0800

> ...Evolutionists have no good answer for the lack of historical evidence of
> man's existence much beyond 5,000 years ago...

This is an argument I haven't heard before. I assume by "historical"
evidence you mean written history. Do you really think that Homo sapiens

But as you must have realized, Cummins "argument" is easily explained when realizing the "written" requirement.

is so smart that we must have invented writing within the first few years
of our existence (whether created or evolved)? This seems equivalent to
arguing that man can't be much older than the printing press, or the steam
engine, or the theory of quantum mechanics.