> Andrew? Is that you? The completely groundless, but sweeping,
> claims made concerning the integrity of others fits my
> recollection pretty well.
Yes, it's me. And, I'm still waiting for an emperical example of an
indefinite increase of complexity in a closed system (evolution). So far
you've hypothesized the equivalent of an invisible pink unicorn
(evolution)and you say it's running around because you can see its tracks in
the ground (the circumstantial evidence). Present the unicorn -- I say
those are just horse tracks.