Re: bad science

Glenn R. Morton (
Fri, 19 Jun 1998 19:28:10 -0500

At 06:18 PM 6/19/98 -0500, Thom Quinn wrote:
>I though I'd pass this on to this list, more pseudoscience is NOT
>what the public needs to read.


>We must not allow such things be passed off on the public as REAL

Thom, while I might agree with your assessment (haven't seen it) I would
suggest that there is nothing to be done. Censorship is something that I
have experienced at the hands of young-earth creationists and
anti-evolutionists, but it is nothing I want to engage in. Let the public
figure out what they need to read. If our arguments can't convince someone
of the correctness of evolution, censorship is probably a worse tool.

Adam, Apes and Anthropology
Foundation, Fall and Flood
& lots of creation/evolution information