Re: Chance

Cliff Lundberg (cliff@noevalley.com)
Wed, 20 May 1998 02:58:35 -0700

Greg Billock wrote:

> The newest Creationist literature, it seems to me, is a great improvement
> in that it is placed in this territory--Behe (by all accounts) thinks that
> common ancestry is a fact as much as Gould, but has doubts that currently-
> active evolutionary processes can explain it.

Implying that macroevolution has occurred, but through processes
not currently operating? Is this view found in the newest creationist
literature?

-- 
Cliff Lundberg ~ San Francisco ~ cliff@noevalley.com