Re: CSI was [Re: Comment to Bill Hamilton

John W. Burgeson (
Wed, 19 Mar 1997 09:20:56 -0500

I tried several times to reply to / add to your last remarks on Dembski.
But I think that your grasp of the problem exceeds mine by a sufficient
amount that anything I add would be superflous. I like your "reply from a
theistic scientist" approach -- maybe you'll next post a "reply from a
non-theistic scientist?

(I find that I am very uncomfortable with that term -- "theistic
scientist." Just my background & training, I am sure. I really discovered
this when I wrote the term "non-theistic scientist" above.)