Re: Refuting Aristotle et al (was Re: [asa] Dawkins on the fossil record)

From: Murray Hogg <muzhogg@netspace.net.au>
Date: Tue Dec 15 2009 - 21:43:44 EST

I'm confused...

Whenever I say something people agree with I'm a quotable genius.

Otherwise I'm an ignorant, anti-philosophical, moronic schmuck with no more right to an opinion than a lamp-post.

Probably there's an explanation...

>
> Quit this 'Greg' charade, please 'Dennis'.
>
> My name is Greg or Gregory. Afford me the respect as a friend and brother.
>
> Murray wrote: "I already agreed that *there must be a first human*. /
> The problem is the definition of "human"."
>
> This is simply what I need Dennis to say: "*there must be a first
> human*." For now I simply don't care what 'the definition' is or isn't.
>
> What is Dennis' answer: Yes or no? I'll rest the issue with that.
>
> *From:* Dennis Venema <Dennis.Venema@twu.ca>
> *To:* Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca>; Murray Hogg
> <muzhogg@netspace.net.au>; ASA <asa@calvin.edu>
> *Sent:* Wed, December 16, 2009 3:01:51 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Refuting Aristotle et al (was Re: [asa] Dawkins on the
> fossil record)
>
> Hi “Greg”,
>
> I see you continue to avoid my questions. Hopefully you’ll address this
> one – what “problem with my philosophy” do you see?
>
> Dennis
>
> Looking for the perfect gift?* Give the gift of Flickr!*
> <http://www.flickr.com/gift/>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Dec 15 21:44:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 15 2009 - 21:44:01 EST