Re: [asa] finally convinced

From: Randy Isaac <>
Date: Sat Dec 12 2009 - 22:15:27 EST

Indeed, I should not use sarcasm or be flippant. I apologize and will not do that again.
Instead, I will strive to be more like you.
Chastened and contrite,

P.S. I'll report two more news items without a trace of sarcasm. (No, I didn't make these up!)

Earlier this week, Howie Carr, a Boston area radio talk show host, pointed out that CO2 could not possibly be a culprit in global warming. After all, we know that CO2 is vital to life and therefore cannot be harmful.

Today Hal Lindsey was saying in his broadcast that the hacked emails clearly showed the collusion of scientists and politicians to fabricate data. He then provided evidence that solar energy was the real source of global warming--Luke 21:25 anticipates the global warming controversy and cites the sun as the real factor.

From: Michael Roberts
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 2:56 AM
To: Randy Isaac ;
Subject: Re: [asa] finally convinced


I find your post very flippant. I would never say anything like that

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Randy Isaac
  Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 2:23 AM
  Subject: [asa] finally convinced

  One more post tonight if I may. I just heard a very convincing argument against AGW. A few minutes ago, Cal Beisner was interviewed on the Christian TV network INSP. He pointed out that a planet that would be in peril from an increase in atmospheric CO2 from 0.027% to 0.038% would not be a "good" planet. But we know from Gen. 1 that the earth is good. Hence, global warming isn't due to CO2 and advocating AGW is tantamount to dismissing God.

  I hadn't thought of that. Its irrefutable logic leaves me speechless and without response.

  Where do I sign?


To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Dec 12 22:16:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 12 2009 - 22:16:01 EST