Re: [asa] ID question?

From: Gregory Arago <>
Date: Sun Oct 18 2009 - 16:32:10 EDT

Which 'science' does 'evolutionary theory' not apply to in your view, Moorad? Are all 'ahistorical' sciences exempt from it? Perhaps in George's view, evolutionary theory applies to 'all sciences,' while in your view it applies only to 'some sciences'. Is that about right? ________________________________ From: "Alexanian, Moorad" <> To: George Murphy <>; dfsiemensjr <>; "" <> Cc: "" <>; "" <> Sent: Sun, October 18, 2009 11:32:47 PM Subject: RE: [asa] ID question? We all exist in time and so there is nothing outside history—no one can run away from it. However, the aim of experimental science is to arrive at results that are invariant under time translation. Surely, that is not the aim of evolutionary theory. Moorad ________________________________________ From: George Murphy [] Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 7:31 PM To: Alexanian, Moorad; dfsiemensjr; Cc:; Subject: Re: [asa] ID question? Therewith assuming that history & science are disjoint.  How long do we have to keep on with this sort of thing? Shalom George ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexanian, Moorad" <> To: "dfsiemensjr" <>; <> Cc: <>; <> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 6:46 PM Subject: RE: [asa] ID question? >A simple way to state your findings is that evolution has to do a lot more >with history than with science—something many of us have been saying for a >long time. > Moorad __________________________________________________________________ Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Oct 18 16:33:18 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 18 2009 - 16:33:18 EDT