Re: [asa] The image of God- question for Lamoureux

From: Murray Hogg <>
Date: Thu Oct 08 2009 - 13:17:20 EDT

Dehler, Bernie wrote:
> However- this does pose a very interesting question for Denis Lamoureux. As I understand Denis, he says "there is no Adam" just like there is no firmament. Can we go farther? The only mention of "made in the image of God" is also from the same passage! No firmament, no literal man named Adam... why not also no literal 'image of God' given at one point. Wouldn't that be consistent? It is all Gen. chapter 1! Shouldn't the same hermeneutic be used on the whole chapter?

So, no sun and moon, then?


To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Oct 8 13:18:18 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 08 2009 - 13:18:18 EDT