Re: [asa] Re: Reading Genesis theologically NOT historically

From: Merv Bitikofer <>
Date: Sat Oct 03 2009 - 19:46:43 EDT

Murray Hogg wrote:
> 1) That evolution happened - here let me say that I adopt this not
> because I have a blind devotion to scientific consensus but because it
> provides a theologically challenging 'worst case' scenario.
Thanks for all your insights thus far, Murray. This particular remark,
however, sounds incongruous with previous remarks (of yours?). If
biological evolution and a proper Christo-centric theology fit each
other so well or well enough, then what is so 'worst case' about it?
Or were you just lapsing into an alternate popular-warfare perspective?


To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Oct 3 19:47:21 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 03 2009 - 19:47:21 EDT