Re: [asa] "Evolutionary Creation" book comments (was: RE: (fall-away) TE and apologetics)

From: Denis O. Lamoureux <>
Date: Tue Sep 29 2009 - 16:38:30 EDT

Bernie writes:
> 3. You imply, therefore, that the theology of the Bible is not, and can't
> be, 'ancient and incidental' in the same exact way as applies to science
> and history. I disagree, and say the origin of sin is one such example of
> ancient theology.

Goodness gracious! I IMPLY?!? I refer to Scripture being
inerrant/infallible once every 2.5 pages in my book!
How many times do I need to repeat this?

Bernie, you are now wasting my time. Re-read my posts. I've answered your
questions, but because you (want to?) continue to be entrenched in
CONFLATIONS you are repeatedly missing the point. My suggestion is start
from the beginning, the astronomy in Scripture, build your hermeneutic
there, and then go to Adam.

It is in now clear to me that this is no longer an academic exchange, but
spiritual forces are clouding the discussion.

Over and out,

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Sep 29 16:39:43 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 29 2009 - 16:39:43 EDT