RE: [asa] Lawrence Krauss Defends New Atheism

From: Alexanian, Moorad <>
Date: Fri Jun 26 2009 - 22:49:41 EDT

The virgin birth is peanuts compared with the notion of a Creator God. I never quite understood why that issue is ever brought up. The virgin birth must be something to be doubted only by atheists.
From: [] On Behalf Of Cameron Wybrow []
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [asa] Lawrence Krauss Defends New Atheism


Re Miller: agreed. Not that I am claiming that Christianity is unthinkable without a literal virgin birth, but the virgin birth is (I believe) still a core Catholic doctrine. So if (as is reported) Miller would not defend it, what happened to Miller's claim to be "100% Darwinian and 100% Catholic"? I guess that one of those "hundred per cents" was a rhetorical exaggeration. But then, I suppose that we should not expect theological clarity from a Catholic who claims to believe in Darwin's God, when Darwin was an agnostic.


----- Original Message -----
From: Nucacids<>
To: Nucacids<> ;<>
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [asa] Lawrence Krauss Defends New Atheism

Two immediate observations:

1. It is very disappointing to see Miller back away from the virgin birth of Christ. Given his position and status, this will feed into the perception that once Christians accept evolution, it's a slippery slope that leads to rejection of a literal virgin birth and resurrection of Christ.

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jun 26 22:51:18 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 26 2009 - 22:51:18 EDT