RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy

From: Dehler, Bernie <>
Date: Mon May 18 2009 - 11:14:40 EDT

Hi Murray-

 Obviously the body count would be higher for Hitler than Alexander the great because Alexander didn't have access to the same killing machinery and killing technology as Hitler had. The questions is "What if Hitler would have had the same mindset as Alexander the Great" and would things have then been much worse? Obvious- it is just speculation.

 As for the cold war- it wasn't much of a war, in terms of body count... so it wasn't much of a "war."

 As for suicide bombers starting WWIII, all I can say is "What???"

 The worst a terrorist could ever do is set-off a nuke. All the nations of the world are trying to prevent such a thing, so if it happened, there would be a worldwide witch-hunt for that terrorist and his organization. And if a nation didn't participate in this worldwide witch hunt, they would get destroyed by the other major powers (like the USA took out Afghanistan because of their sheltering the Taliban extremists).

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Murray Hogg
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy

Dehler, Bernie wrote:
>If Hitler and Stalin were like Alexander the Great- the death toll would have been much greater.

Even a cursory investigation into the numbers shows this to be way off the mark;

I've tabled the figures below, but the basic breakdown is;

Alexander: 256 thousand

Hitler: 17 million

Stalin: 22 million

Where the casualty figures for the German/Soviet conflict (approx 4 million) have been equally divided. Arguably Hitler should be credited with the lion's share of these casualties as he started the conflict by invading Russia. I have, however, included figures for the Soviet/Finnish winter war - so not ALL the 4 million (approx) should be credited to Hitler. It doesn't affect the final outcome much, however.

Obviously the total casualties shows Alexander to be far less than those who perished due to Hitler or Stalin. Weighing the figures against world populations shows Alexander in a poorer light, but the claim that he is worse than Hitler or Stalin still doesn't bear up.

Taking world-population as 162 million in 400 BC and 2300 million in 1940 (US census bureau figures: we get;

Alexander: 260000/162 = 1580 deaths per million of world population

Hitler: 17 million / 2300 = 7391 deaths per million of world population

Stalin: 22 million / 2300 = 9565 deaths per million of world population

On the basis of which figures I think the claim that Alexander was worse than Stalin or Hitler is demonstrably incorrect.


NB: A more detailed breakdown of the figures and their sources is as follows. Note that I thought the original claim was so obviously false that I didn't bother researching this in any depth - if anybody thinks the figures are worth contesting, they can supply alternative figures from more credible sources:

*Estimate of military casualties*

Alexander : 162,000

German/Soviet conflict (including Soviet/Finnish Winter War): 3,964,000

(note that the casualty figures for German actions against non Soviet forces are omitted)


*Estimate of civilian casualties*

Alexander: The only known actions against of Alexander against civilian populations were following the seiges of Thebes, Tyre and Gaza. I have been able to find the following figures (which include the military casualties)

Thebes: 36,000 (military and civilian:
Tyre: 22,000 (miliary and civilian:
Gaza: actual figure unknown ( - but take the population of Thebes as an estimate: 36,000

Nazi Germany: 15 to 30 million


Stalinist Russia: 20 to 50 million


To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon May 18 11:15:32 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 18 2009 - 11:15:32 EDT