Re: [asa] No Adam?

From: gordon brown <Gordon.Brown@Colorado.EDU>
Date: Sat May 02 2009 - 22:00:31 EDT

On Sat, 2 May 2009, wrote:

> Whereas asking "who was the first created human" is probably not meaningful, it is potentially more meaningful to ask "who was the first fallen human?"  That can be answered (in principle) without appealing to arbitrary definitions.  Fallen-ness entails becoming culpable before God for rebellious choices against Him, and that is probably a black-or-white issue, creatures being either culpable or not culpable as a real ontological fact. 


What do you think is the eternal destiny of the parents of the first
fallen human?

Gordon Brown (ASA member)

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat May 2 22:01:19 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 02 2009 - 22:01:19 EDT