Re: [asa] The Daily Me

From: Glenn Morton <>
Date: Sat Mar 21 2009 - 16:53:30 EDT

But it also supports a widespread view in the global warming community that
there is no reason but political to object to AGW and thus, it is something
that is confirmatory of the 'consensus opinion' and thus the conclusion will
not be questioned by AGW advocates cause it fits their stereotypes so
well--all GW deniers are right-wing nutters.

So, the question is, who is doing the echo chamber routine--researcher or
subject, or both? The problem I see is that advocates always pick out the
other side as the ones who are merely echo chambering.

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Burgeson (ASA member)" <>
To: "Randy Isaac" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [asa] The Daily Me

> Just posted on RealClimate:
> Ethical Technology
> Posted: Mar 19, 2009
> Academics at Britain’s first conference on the psychology of climate
> change argued that the greatest obstacles to action are not technical,
> economic or political—they are the denial strategies that we adopt to
> protect ourselves from unwelcome information.
> Is there a “psychology of climate change”? According to this article
> from The Guardian, there is.
> Two points that leapt out at me from the linked article:
> Dr Myanna Lahsen, a cultural anthropologist at the University of
> Colorado, has speci alised (word split because of spam blocker) in
> understanding how professional scientists, some of them with highly
> respected careers, turn climate sceptic. She found the largest common
> factor was a shared sense that they had personally lost prestige and
> authority as the result of campaigns by liberals and
> environmentalists.
> One academic study of 192 sceptic books and reports found that 92%
> were directly associated with right wing free market think tanks. It
> concluded that the denial of climate change had been deliberately
> constructed “as a tactic of an elite-driven counter-movement designed
> to combat environmentalism”.
> That 92% number is pretty high. It seems to support your thesis.
> jb
> To unsubscribe, send a message to with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Mar 21 16:53:47 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 21 2009 - 16:53:47 EDT