Re: [asa] scientific fact vs. ideology?

From: David Clounch <>
Date: Tue Mar 17 2009 - 09:44:13 EDT


The real question is whether those with power are going to ignore everyone
who believes in any kind of creator.

-Dave C

My take on all this comes more from the recent Weissman Perkins debate on
Nightline. Weissman speaks for the national academy of science, and while he
says elected policy makers should be in charge that is exactly what Perkins
asked for too, and Weissman disagrees with him. When Weissman was asked who
really was going to govern this his answer was the NIH but then he didn't
have any answer to the question of who oversees them. Weissman looked very
angry and seemed to be looking down his nose with derision at Perkins. So I
be very surprised to learn that Weissman is open to notions of "God as the
creator and governor of the real world". Why should he listen to anyone on
this list any more than he would listen to Perkins?

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:10 PM, George Murphy <> wrote:

> AGAIN - I have not heard anyone who has participated in this discussion on
> the list say that the issue of ESCR should be "left up to science." Everyone
> has agreed that it is not just a scientific but an ethical issue - & of
> course for Christians ethics should be informed by theology. The question
> is rather whether our ethical reflections should take scientific knowledge
> seriously and be open to changing long-held views if the scientific evidence
> warrants it. The theology that informs our ethics should be theology that
> understands God as the creator and governor of the real world, the same
> world that science explores.
> Shalom
> George
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Clounch" <
> To: "Alexanian, Moorad" <>
> Cc: "Christine Smith" <>; <>
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 7:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [asa] scientific fact vs. ideology?
> Alexian,
>> I agree. This is why the subject cannot be left up to science.
>> Thanks,
>> Dave C

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Mar 17 09:44:27 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 17 2009 - 09:44:27 EDT