RE: [asa] scientific fact vs. ideology?

From: Alexanian, Moorad <>
Date: Sat Mar 14 2009 - 09:33:34 EDT

It is a question of what inference does one make of the fact that the “distance” in DNA space between chimps and humans is close. People, scientists or otherwise, have to struggle with the question of what is the nature of humans vis-à-vis other aspects of Nature. In particular, what is truly to be a human? For Christians it reduces to the question, does the breath of God (Gen. 2:7) make any scientific sense or any sense at all? Remember even if I knew my whole genealogical tree, I would still have to struggle with the question, who am I?

From: Preston Garrison []
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 2:23 AM
To: Alexanian, Moorad; ASA list
Subject: RE: [asa] scientific fact vs. ideology?

>Is the DNA of a fertilized egg the same as the potential adult that
>it will develop into? If so, then since the DNA is what constitutes
>or characterized a person as purported by most scientists,

If you are going to make assertions about what people believe, please
name the people you are referring to and justify the assertion.


To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Mar 14 09:34:35 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 14 2009 - 09:34:35 EDT