Errata: (Re: [asa] A theology question (imminent return of Christ))

From: Murray Hogg <>
Date: Wed Oct 15 2008 - 18:48:59 EDT

Hi all,

Do you too realize your posts were badly edited AFTER they arrive on the list?

Please disregard the reference to "two points" in the below - The second point morphed into my comments on Christ's unrecorded teaching.

Just so you don't die wondering...

Blessings as always,

Murray Hogg wrote:
> I've also tried to point out that the idea of a return "in our lifetime"
> seems to me a SECONDARY idea - probably inferred from the PRIMARY idea
> of a "sudden" return. Certainly both ideas are consistent with the idea
> of an IMMINENT return. Here I note two points: first, "imminent" is OUR
> word - imposed upon the Scriptural witness precisely in order to force
> the rather disparate sayings into a false unity. I've been trying to get
> past this term to actually look at the data WITHOUT imposing our later
> attempts at unifying theological construction, but to no avail.

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Oct 15 18:49:34 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 15 2008 - 18:49:34 EDT