Re: [asa] A theology question (imminent return of Christ)

From: <>
Date: Tue Oct 07 2008 - 18:45:09 EDT

1) Jesus himself said that he didn't know the date of the parousia (Mk.13:32).

2) In comparison with 13.7 Gyr since the beginning of the universe, 2000 years isn't much of a delay.


---- "Dehler wrote:
> Here's a question I have.
> In the NT, it is obvious that the disciples thought Jesus would return at any time and that the end was near. For example, that's why in Acts it says the believers had everything in common- sold what they had and shared everything. We would too if we seriously thought Christ would return tomorrow, but we don't really believe it. So we keep our own money- our retirement and college plans for our kids. We don't believe in the imminent return of Christ like the first believers did, as evidenced by our behavior.
> Here's my question: Was Jesus wrong when He taught about the immediate return? How do we explain his slowness in coming, when they all thought it would have happened almost 2,000 years ago? And since it has been so long already, what's the big deal if Jesus waits another 2,000 years? I know that's inconceivable to most evangelical Christians, just like if you told a Christian in 100AD that Christ still did not return by 2000AD.
> No need to post scripture about "scoffers who say Christ isn't going to return." That isn't the question. The question is how to you resolve the fact that Christ clearly taught, and His disciples clearly believed, in the imminent return, which didn't happen yet? There was no imminent return. If Christ returns today, it was not imminent.
> It is a genuine problem that I have and am pondering, as a believer.
> ...Bernie

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Oct 7 18:45:33 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 07 2008 - 18:45:33 EDT