Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3 from Timaeus: to Don Nield; major statement re Denton

From: David Opderbeck <>
Date: Mon Sep 29 2008 - 16:11:46 EDT

Timeaus said: But there is no evidence none, zero, zilch, nada that
they can build an eye, a circulatory system, or an avian lung (the last of
which, Mr. Nield, is discussed in both of Denton's books).
I respond: In my view, this empirical claim is the heart of the matter.
How does a non-biologist assess this claim?

David W. Opderbeck
Associate Professor of Law
Seton Hall University Law School
Gibbons Institute of Law, Science & Technology
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Ted Davis <> wrote:
> I'd like to reply to Don Nield's latest two posts (his earlier reply to me,
> and his newest remarks to Mike Gene).  After doing so, I will make a major
> statement regarding the thought of Michael Denton, and its relation to ID,
> TE, and Darwinism, and I hope that not just Don but others will respond.
To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Sep 29 16:12:09 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 29 2008 - 16:12:09 EDT