RE: [asa] physics questions (surf. brightness)

From: George Cooper <georgecooper@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu Sep 18 2008 - 09:15:06 EDT

Here is one that may surprise some..

 

If an astronomer is using a 1 meter (aperture dia.) telescope to observe
surface features on Jupiter and is using an eyepiece that yields the best
surface brightness, how much larger a telescope (aperture) will she need in
order to double the surface brightness (assuming she also uses the
appropriate eyepiece for max. brightness)?

 

[Geoerge wrote] This differs from the previous result by having the square
of the sum of the speeds instead of the sum of the squared speeds, and will
thus be greater because of the cross term 2vV.

 

On the balloon problem: Answers previously given are OK but there's a
broader viewpoint - perhaps surprisingly, general relativity. According to
Einstein's equivalence principle, an observer in an accelerated frame can
always treat the effects of acceleration as an artificial gravitational
field in his/her vicinity. In an accelerating car this gravity is toward
the rear and we all know that balloons go up - opposite to the gravitational
field - so in this case it will go forward.

 

Very nice on both.

 

Coope

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Sep 18 09:15:49 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 18 2008 - 09:15:49 EDT