Re: [asa] Letter, Richard Dawkins on the Royal Society row

From: George Murphy <>
Date: Tue Sep 16 2008 - 20:47:38 EDT

The notion that there is "inconsistency" between being a Christian & criticizing "creation" shows the depth of Dawkins' ignorance of religion. It is so because he says so - sic voleo, sic jubeo.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Dehler, Bernie
  Cc: ASA Affiliation
  Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 6:05 PM
  Subject: [asa] Letter, Richard Dawkins on the Royal Society row


  Letter, Richard Dawkins on the Royal Society row:



  If the Royal Society wanted to attack creationism with all fists flying, as I would hope, an ordained priest might make a politically effective spokesman, however much we might deplore his inconsistency.

  This is the role that Kenneth Miller, not a priest but a devout Christian, plays in America, where he is arguably creationism's most formidable critic.



To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Sep 16 20:48:20 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 16 2008 - 20:48:20 EDT