Re: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb

From: Merv <>
Date: Mon Sep 15 2008 - 19:38:48 EDT

I'm not big on working up details of eschatology either, and yet it is
(to the dismay of many liberal Christians) hard to extricate some notion
of end-time hope from core Christian theology. Having said that, I had
never thought of this Isaiah passage in the ways you bring up --that
certainly would fail to match Jesus' answer to the Sanhedrin (...they
shall neither marry nor be given in marriage...). In my own
eschatological simplicity I can only speculate that the Isaiah passage
sounds like it must be referring to something entirely different than
"when our mortal bodies become clothed in immortality" --to paraphrase
Paul in Romans 15. But then this would leave us to speculate on when
the Isaiah prophecies will (or did) occur? And since wolves and lambs
have not entered that blissful state with each other yet, it would seem
to be either colorful imagery or else still in the future.


Murray Hogg wrote:
> Sorry all - this was an EXCEPTIONAL typo on my part.
> I had in mind Isaiah 65:20 (and even checked the reference) where I
> take the mention of "an infant/the child" to suggest an underlying
> assumption that people are still marrying and having families;
> No more shall an infant from there live but a few days,
> Nor an old man who has not fulfilled his days;
> For the child shall die one hundred years old,
> But the sinner being one hundred years old shall be accursed.
> And note Isaiah 65:17 which introduces the passage in which the above
> is found;
> For behold, I create new heavens and a new earth;
> And the former shall not be remembered or come to mind.
> I have NO idea how I got "11:23" from "65:20"!
> I'll repeat that I'm not sure what to make of this - except perhaps
> that in biblical studies (as in science) one ought to have a certain
> tolerance for ambiguity! I'm certainly not trying to develop any
> eschatological claims. I merely note that these verses appear -- even
> with a degree of reflection -- to stand in some conflict with common
> conceptions of the eschaton.
> I'm open to suggestions as to how such data can be reconciled with
> common notions of eschatology, but as things stand I wonder if our
> present conceptions are perhaps not too naive?
> Apologies for the quite bizarre typo.
> Blessings,
> Murray Hogg
> Pastor, East Camberwell Baptist Church, Victoria, Australia
> Post-Grad Student (MTh), Australian College of Theology
> Merv wrote:
>> Murray Hogg wrote:
>>> Problematic is the fact that there are elements in the text which
>>> don't quite marry with a Christian notion of eschatology - for
>>> instance, Isaiah 11:23 suggests that family life will continue much
>>> as it does in the present but with the elimination of any negative
>>> aspects. Yet Jesus suggests something rather different (Matt 22:30;
>>> Mark 12:25).
>> Isaiah 11:23 doesn't exist. But I am still curious what verse you
>> had in mind regarding family life --was it a verse 23 of some other
>> chapter? I haven't found it.
>> --Merv

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Sep 15 19:34:33 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 15 2008 - 19:34:33 EDT