Re: [asa] Stars May Not Be So Fine Tuned After All

From: Don Nield <d.nield@auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Wed Jul 30 2008 - 19:37:24 EDT

Rich's question is pertinent. My comment is not relevant to the title of
the thread, but only to Moorad's last statement. My apologies for the
thread splitting.
Don

Rich Blinne wrote:
> I'm lost here. What does this have to do with whether the fine tuning
> argument is valid or not?
>
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Don Nield wrote:
>
>> I disagree with Moorad on a number of things but on this one I agree
>> with him. A Creator must be an Intelligent Designer. A designer (with
>> a small d) need not be a Creator.
>> I find it interesting that Ken Miller in his latest book argues that
>> Behe's version of a designer is in effect a creator.
>> Don
>>
>> Alexanian, Moorad wrote:
>>> If I am not wrong, a designer need not be a Creator, but certainly a
>>> Creator is a Designer and if you can create then you must be
>>> intelligent. Therefore, a Creator must be an Intelligent Designer.
>>>
>>>
>>> Moorad
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jul 30 19:37:42 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 30 2008 - 19:37:42 EDT