Re: [asa] Four myths about I.D.; four myths about T.E.

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. <>
Date: Wed Jul 02 2008 - 16:34:34 EDT

This is a nonsense question, for the basis of science is not scientific.
Neither is morality. One can subscribe to metaphysical naturalism only by
refusing to consider some deeper questions. This is a characteristic of
all philosophical matters. A theist insists that one cannot ask what
caused God, though atheists insist that it needs to be answered. This is
why I have a Christian faith, for I cannot prove it. Dawkins may not
recognize that his is an atheistic faith, which I cannot disprove. The
most I can manage is to show that it is not a scientific theory.
Dave (ASA)

On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:43:22 -0700 "Dehler, Bernie"
<> writes:
“One needs continually to note that metaphysical claims, whether
atheistic, deistic, pantheistic, panentheistic, polytheistic or theistic,
are not supported by any of the sciences.“
But if science could explain how everything happened naturally, does that
mean that “God is out of a job?” …just wondering… if the need for a
Creator would then be superfluous, as Dawkins might likely argue.
Comfort your feet with a new pair of slippers. Click here!

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jul 2 16:37:11 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 02 2008 - 16:37:11 EDT