Re: [asa] A Message from the RTB Scholar Team (fwd)

From: Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca>
Date: Sat Apr 19 2008 - 02:46:28 EDT

Yes Don, nail on the head! Why couldn't George have said this in the first place, to avoid misunderstanding? Thanks for your clarity! - G.

Don Nield <d.nield@auckland.ac.nz> wrote: In context, this must be "biological evolution of humans". Any other
interpretation is perverse.
Don

George Murphy wrote:
> OK, let's take a poll here. Does anyone on the list besides Gregory have any doubt about what I meant by "human evolution" in the statement "Hugh's position would be strengthened in at least one way if he would accept human evolution"?
>
> Shalom
> George
> http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
       
---------------------------------
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Apr 19 02:47:50 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 19 2008 - 02:47:50 EDT