Re: [asa] Was Adam a real person?

From: George Murphy <gmurphy@raex.com>
Date: Wed Apr 09 2008 - 10:45:44 EDT

"Wiilingly ignorant"? Or maybe just aware of a fairly common phenomenon in which a person (or object, or event &c) gets invented in order to explain a name. There's a word for it, eponym, as in my old Webster's 2d.

"The person, real or mythical, from whom a family, race, city, or nation is supposed to have taken its name; as, Hellen is the eponym of the Hellenes".

Note "real or mythical". Such a person may of course be real but need not be.

Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Dick Fischer
  To: ASA
  Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:28 AM
  Subject: RE: [asa] Was Adam a real person?

  Hi George:

   

  I think Asshur is a good case in point. He is Noah's grandson and gets special mention in that he founded Nineveh. The city of Asshur is named for him and we know where it is. Assyria is named for him and Assyria is mentioned frequently in the Bible and we all know its place in history. Assyrian kings were named after him. Asshur was described often in Assyrian literature as a god. When the East India arrived in Iraq in the 1800's the native Bedouins still referred to the land as "al Asshur." Anybody who would suggest that Asshur is not a historical person would be just willingly ignorant.

   

  Canaan is also Noah's grandson. Do we not know something about the Canaanites? I found the name of Elam, another one of Noah's grandsons, in an Iranian history book listed as a king, and the Elamites destroyed Sumer in 2000 BC. And so it goes. Pre-flood persons and patriarchs are harder to find, that's a fact, but almost every person and tribe in Genesis 10 can be found somewhere.

   

  Dick Fischer. author, lecturer

  Historical Genesis from Adam to Abraham

  www.historicalgenesis.com

   

  -----Original Message-----
  From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On Behalf Of George Murphy
  Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:18 PM
  To: Dick Fischer; ASA
  Subject: Re: [asa] Was Adam a real person?

   

  The possibility that a "supposed burial site" of Jonah in Nineveh might be the product of the imagination of or believers centuries later might be considered. Ditto fvor other "proofs."

   

  Anyone who's been to Israel knows of the many gospel sites identified by "pious Christian tradition" - i.e., by Christians centuries after the events took place. E.g., the site traditionally identified as that of the wedding at Cana is wrong, but it's more accessible for pilgrims than the out-of-the-way real Cana. Of course this doesn't mean that all the traditional identifications are wrong. (E.g., there's good evidence that the Church of the Resurrection - aka Holy Sepulchre - really does enclose the site of Golgotha & the tomb of Christ. OTOH the traditional via dolorossa is wrong.) But just a tradition of pointing to some spot & identifying it with a biblical event or person proves next to nothing.

   

  Shalom
  George
  http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: Dick Fischer

    To: ASA

    Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:17 PM

    Subject: RE: [asa] Was Adam a real person?

     

    Hi David:

     

    Job is one issue - who was there to witness the sons of God gathering together and could have transcribed the conversation between Satan and God? Jonah is another issue. There are two crumbling mounds in Mosul (ancient Nineveh) today. One is called the "mound of repentance." The other is called the mound of the nebi Yonas (prophet Jonah.) Plus, there is a mosque erected over the supposed burial site.

     

    Abraham rebuked his father Terah who was an idolator in Jubliees. Josephus said, "In the tenth generation after the flood there was a man among the Chaldeans who was just, great and knowledgeable about heavenly phenomena." That would be Abraham. He was further described as ".a person of great sagacity, both for understanding all things, and persuading his hearers, and not mistaken in his inferences. So he began to have higher notions of virtue than others had, and determined to alter and change the opinion all men then had concerning God; for he was the first that ventured to declare that there was but one God, the Creator of the Universe; and that of other things whatever contributed anything to the happiness of men, as only according to his appointment, and not by its own power."

     

    Berossus wrote: "... a man named Abraham, a man of noble race and superior to all others in wisdom. Of him they relate that he was the inventor of astrology and the Chaldean magic, and that on account of his eminent piety he was esteemed by God. It is further said that under the directions of God he removed and lived in Phenicia (sic), and there taught the Phenicians the motions of the sun and moon, and all other things; for which reason he was held in great reverence by their king."

     

    One archaeologist, Hilprecht, from the University of Pennsylvania visited the tomb of Daniel. I read his book and he described the journey to the tomb. How can you question whether or not there was a prophet Isaiah? Who wrote the book? Somebody had to write the book and hand it to somebody else who would have known the authorship. Any imposter would have been discovered immediately.

     

    Joseph and Mary traveled to the city of David. For whom was the city named?

     

    Dick Fischer. author, lecturer

    Historical Genesis from Adam to Abraham

    www.historicalgenesis.com

     

     

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Apr 9 10:49:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 10:49:03 EDT