[asa] Re: [asa] RE: [asa] FYI: Gore´s 9 errors

From: Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Sat Oct 13 2007 - 15:44:57 EDT

Just to say I had never heard of the New Party until I read this!! It seems
to be the UK equivalent of Freerepublic and very marginal.

The judge seems poorly informed .

This is the problem of bringing science into lawcourts as every American
should know.

Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexanian, Moorad" <alexanian@uncw.edu>
To: "Carol or John Burgeson" <burgytwo@juno.com>; <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 5:24 PM
Subject: [asa] RE: [asa] FYI: Gore´s 9 errors

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/climatewatch/article.html?in_article_id=69679&in_page_id=59
<http://www.metro.co.uk/news/climatewatch/article.html?in_article_id=69679&in_page_id=59>

Judge: Al Gore's nine incovenient truths

Wednesday, October 10, 2007 A High Court judge turned film critic today as
he highlighted "nine scientific errors" in Al Gore's Oscar-winning climate
change documentary, An Inconvenient Truth.

The judge said some of the errors had arisen in "the context of alarmism and
exaggeration" to support the former US vice-president's thesis on global
warming.

The Government's decision to show the film in secondary schools had come
under attack from father-of-two Stewart Dimmock, a Kent school governor and
a member of political group the The New Party, who accused the Government of
"brainwashing" children with propaganda.

Mr Justice Burton ruled at London's High Court that the film, much acclaimed
by environmentalists, could be shown in schools as part of a climate change
resource pack, but only if it was accompanied by new guidance notes to
balance Mr Gore's "one-sided" views.

The judge said it might be necessary for the Department of Children, Schools
and Families to make clear to teaching staff that some of Mr Gore's views
were not supported or promoted by the Government, and there was "a view to
the contrary".

The judge said he had viewed the film and described it as "a powerful,
dramatically presented and highly professionally produced film".

It was built round the "charismatic presence" of the ex vice president
"whose crusade it now is to persuade the world of the dangers of climate
change caused by global warming".

But the judge then set out nine alleged errors in the film in which
statements were made that were not supported by the current mainstream
scientific consensus.

ERROR: Mr Gore asserted that a sea-level rise of up to 20 feet would be
caused by melting of either West Antarctica or Greenland "in the near
future".

The judge said: "This is distinctly alarmist and part of Mr Gore's "wake-up
call".

It was common ground that if Greenland melted it would release this amount
of water - "but only after, and over, millennia."

ERROR: The film had also asserted that low-lying inhabited Pacific atolls
"are being inundated because of anthropogenic global warming" - but there
was no evidence of any evacuation having yet happened.

ERROR: The documentary had also spoken of global warming "shutting down the
Ocean Conveyor" - the process by which the Gulf Stream is carried over the
North Atlantic to western Europe.

The judge said that, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC), it was "very unlikely" that the Ocean Conveyor, also known as
the Meridional Overturning Circulation, would shut down in the future,
though it might slow down.

ERROR: Mr Gore had also asserted - by ridiculing the opposite view - that
two graphs, one plotting a rise in C02 and the other the rise in temperature
over a period of 650,000 years, showed "an exact fit".

The judge said that, although there was general scientific agreement that
there was a connection, "the two graphs do not establish what Mr Gore
asserts".

ERROR: Mr Gore had asserted that the disappearance of snow on Mt Kilimanjaro
was expressly attributable to global warming. The judge said this had
"specifically impressed" the Environment Secretary David Miliband.

But the scientific consensus was that it cannot be established that the
recession of snows on Mt Kilimanjaro is mainly attributable to human-induced
climate change.

ERROR: The drying up of Lake Chad was used in the film as a prime example of
a catastrophic result of global warming, said the judge.

"However, it is generally accepted that the evidence remains insufficient to
establish such an attribution.

"It is apparently considered to be far more likely to result from other
factors, such as population increase and over-grazing, and regional climate
variability."

ERROR: Mr Gore ascribes Hurricane Katrina and the consequent devastation in
New Orleans to global warming, but there was "insufficient evidence to show
that".

ERROR: MR Gore had also referred to a new scientific study showing that, for
the first time, polar bears were being found that had actually drowned
"swimming long distances - up to 60 miles - to find the ice".

The judge said: "The only scientific study that either side before me can
find is one which indicates that four polar bears have recently been found
drowned because of a storm."

That was not to say there might not in future be drowning-related deaths of
bears if the trend of regression of pack ice continued - "but it plainly
does not support Mr Gore's description".

ERROR: Mr Gore said in the film that coral reefs all over the world were
bleaching because of global warming and other factors.

The judge said the IPCC had reported that, if temperatures were to rise by
1-3 degrees centigrade, there would be increased coral bleaching and
mortality, unless the coral could adapt.

But separating the impacts of stresses due to climate change from other
stresses, such as over-fishing, and pollution was difficult.

A Government spokesperson said it was not proposing to make any further
comment on the case at present.

Moorad

________________________________

From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu on behalf of Carol or John Burgeson
Sent: Sat 10/13/2007 10:48 AM
To: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: [asa] FYI: Gore´s 9 errors

What
 were the nine errors? The post only includes three of them. The three
cited seem to be Gore getting a little ahead of the science, but not
much.

Burgy

>>The nine errors stated by the judge included:

# Mr Gore's assertion that a sea-level rise of up to 20 feet would be
# caused by melting of ice in either West Antarctica or Greenland "in
# the near future". The judge said this was "distinctly alarmist" and
# it was common ground that if Greenland's ice melted it would release
# this amount of water - "but only after, and over, millennia".

# Mr Gore's assertion that the disappearance of snow on Mount
# Kilimanjaro in East Africa was expressly attributable to global
# warming - the court heard the scientific consensus was that it cannot
# be established the snow recession is mainly attributable to
# human-induced climate change.

# Mr Gore's reference to a new scientific study showing that, for the
# first time, polar bears had actually drowned "swimming long distances
# - up to 60 miles - to find the ice". The judge said: "The only
# scientific study that either side before me can find is one which
# indicates that four polar bears have recently been found drowned
# because of a storm.">>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Oct 13 15:46:23 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 13 2007 - 15:46:23 EDT