Re: [asa] Turning back the sun

From: Kirk Bertsche <>
Date: Mon Oct 08 2007 - 16:57:28 EDT

FYI, YEC'ers Whitcomb and DeYoung take exactly the position you
outline below in their book "Our Created Moon" (differing from
Morris' position). After arguing that God COULD have stopped the
earth's rotation, they claim that He DIDN'T because this would
violate statements such as you mention below. So they suggest that
the long day of Joshua was some sort of optical effect, and that the
turning back of the sundial for Hezekiah was a local optical effect
possibly confined to his courtyard.


On Sep 28, 2007, at 9:26 PM, wrote:

> If we want to be hyper-literal in interpreting this passage in
> Joshua, then we should be hyper-literal in interpreting related
> passages, too. Like this one:
> Jeremiah 33:25-26
> 25"Thus says the LORD, 'If My covenant for day and night stand not,
> and the fixed patterns of heaven and earth I have not established,
> 26then I would reject the descendants of Jacob and David My
> servant, not taking from his descendants rulers over the
> descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob...'"
> He says the pattern of day and night are not merely a "fixed
> pattern" that he established, but actually it is at the level of
> being a "covenant". God made a covenant that the day and night
> would be "fixed" (unchanging) patterns. Did God break his covenant
> with the day and night in Joshua 10 by deviating from the fixed
> pattern? Even worse, here in Jeremiah 33 is God now making a
> promise to Israel regarding the utter unbreakableness of his
> covenant, and doing so with an example of a covenant that He knows
> full well He has already broken once before, back in the time of
> Joshua?
> We can make a similar argument from Jeremiah 31:35-36.
> 35a Thus says the LORD,
> Who gives the sun for light by day
> And the fixed order of the moon and the stars for light by
> night,
> ...
> 36 "If this fixed order departs
> From before Me," declares the LORD,
> "Then the offspring of Israel also will cease
> From being a nation before Me forever."
> How believable would God's promise be if we were to understand that
> his "fixed order" wasn't really so fixed back in Joshua?
> Let's not get hyper-literal where the text doesn't demand it. If
> we can see that poetry is being used in Joshua 10, then let's
> recognize that it is poetry. The text allows us to do this, so why
> would we want to get bent out of shape with theories about the
> Earth slowing down? God didn't need to stop the entire Earth from
> spinning to defeat the Amorites.

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Oct 8 17:13:23 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 08 2007 - 17:13:23 EDT