Re: [asa] FYI: Arrogance, dogma and why science - not faith - is the new enemy of

From: Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Tue Aug 21 2007 - 06:10:15 EDT

Please stop airing your ignorance and prejudice. It wears very thin.

There is no argument which will convince you.

Michael

P.S. I think Quantum Mechanics is totally wrong. Can anyone explain to me
briefly why I am wrong.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexanian, Moorad" <alexanian@uncw.edu>
To: "skrogh" <panterragroup@mindspring.com>; <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 2:02 AM
Subject: RE: [asa] FYI: Arrogance, dogma and why science - not faith - is
the new enemy of

> Theories that do not make unambiguous predictions cannot be falsified.
> This applies equally to evolutionary theory and ID.
>
>
> Moorad
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu on behalf of skrogh
> Sent: Mon 8/20/2007 8:22 PM
> To: asa@calvin.edu
> Subject: RE: [asa] FYI: Arrogance, dogma and why science - not faith - is
> the new enemy of
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
>> Behalf Of Alexanian, Moorad
>> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 7:12 PM
>> To: skrogh; asa@calvin.edu
>> Subject: RE: [asa] FYI: Arrogance, dogma and why science - not faith -
>> is the new enemy of
>>
>>
>>
>> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu on behalf of skrogh
>> Sent: Mon 8/20/2007 8:03 PM
>> To: asa@calvin.edu
>> Subject: RE: [asa] FYI: Arrogance, dogma and why science - not
>> faith - is the new enemy of
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
>> > Behalf Of Alexanian, Moorad
>> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 3:17 PM
>> > To: PvM
>> > Cc: James Mahaffy; asa@calvin.edu
>> > Subject: RE: [asa] FYI: Arrogance, dogma and why science - not faith -
>> > is the new enemy of
>> >
>> >
>> > The very same points you make against ID can be similarly be made
>> > against evolutionary theory. Just as design is an "observation
>> > of fact", some may say that evolutionary theory is also an
>> > observation of fact. However, neither observation of fact can be
>> > incorporated into a theory in order to make predications. In
>> > fact, the observation of design is more palpable and real than
>> > the "observation" of common descent. The former is an obvious
>> > observation of fact whereas the latter is a very tenuous
>> > inference from presently existing facts.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Moorad
>> >
>>
>>
>> What would falsify ID?
>
>> What would falsify the major tenets of evolutionary theory?
>>
>>
>>
>> Moorad
>>
>
> You first.
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.0/961 - Release Date: 8/19/2007
> 7:27 AM
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Aug 21 06:16:53 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 21 2007 - 06:16:53 EDT