Re: [asa] FYI: Arrogance, dogma and why science - not faith - is the new enemy of

From: PvM <pvm.pandas@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Aug 19 2007 - 14:40:38 EDT

What science has Behe delivered since he joined the ID movement?
Bill's math is 'written in jello' according to a fellow mathematician.
Point us to some good science done by either one and we can discuss.

On 8/18/07, James Mahaffy <mahaffy@dordt.edu> wrote:
> >>> "Michael Roberts" <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk> 08/17/07 5:08 PM >>>
> [snip]
>
> I am still waiting for some worthwhile science to emanate form ID or YEC
> circles. I might wait a long time.
>
>
>
> Or you might quit painting EVERYONE with the same brush. Marcus Ross's work is good,
>
> Art Chadwick is good. Mike Behe would not have the status he does unless his science had been
> good. As far as I know Bill D.'s math work is decent. David Dewitt's publications in neuroscience seem to be standard science articles. These are just a few that come to mind. I will agree that there is a LOT of poor science in these circles but PLEASE lets not paint it ALL the same way.
>
> James
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Aug 19 14:41:10 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 19 2007 - 14:41:10 EDT