[asa] ID is scientifically vacuous

From: Carol or John Burgeson <burgytwo@juno.com>
Date: Mon Jun 18 2007 - 12:24:46 EDT

Someone wrote "ID is scientifically vacuous.

I provisionally agree, with the observations that:

1. It MIGHT become otherwise given future developments. In a conversation
with Phil Johnson a few years ago, I suggested that this would be ID's
greatest challenge; he agreed.

2. I am unconvinced that it is PHILOSOPHICALLY vacuous.

As to whether (or not) it has any theological value, I am on the fence.


To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Jun 18 12:27:44 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 18 2007 - 12:27:44 EDT