From: Rich Blinne <>
Date: Wed May 30 2007 - 17:13:38 EDT

On 5/30/07, Alexanian, Moorad <> wrote:
> I do not believe that any question regarding "the nature of the universe"
> is a scientific question. In fact, the question is metaphysical and as such
> cannot be answer by any theory, say, evolutionary theory, that purports to
> be scientific. If evolutionary theory can deal with such a question, then we
> have here more than a scientific theory and, therefore, all attempts that
> claim to deal with this question must be treated on equal footing.
> Nor can it be answered by any theory, say, upper-case intelligent design
that purports to be scientific. So, from a lower-case intelligent design
perspective the accusation that it is not scientific is: Good, at least now
we have a shot at answering the question because science -- at least
demarcated science -- has no chance at all.

For a good discussion on how scientism obscures the demarcation issue see
Ian Hutchinson's paper in this quarter's PSCF. Note to Terry: his views
pretty much echoes mine and has the advantage of being stated more

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed May 30 17:14:03 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 30 2007 - 17:14:03 EDT