Re: [asa] gonzalez' citation record

From: <>
Date: Sat May 26 2007 - 16:37:48 EDT

No doubt there are other measures besides h, but you can't use h in the ways you have suggested.  I wouldn't have mentioned it but I've seen you say this a couple of times now.  h is always biased when comparing earlier versus later years.  It's like comparing the balances in bank accounts that have compounding interest.  Earlier deposits always have an advantage over later ones.  A less biased method would be to compare monthly deposits, not compounded balances.


-----Original Message-----
From: PvM <>
To: <>
Sent: Sat, 26 May 2007 12:13 pm
Subject: Re: [asa] gonzalez' citation record

You can limit yourself to papers written in a given timeframe and 
calculate the h factor. For example 2002-2006 versus 1998-2002. 
Compare the amount of papers before 2002 with the amount of (yearly) 
papers afterwards. 
Surely there are better or more relevant statistics to understand the 
value of G's work than just a number like h=20 or normalize h=13 or 
350% exceeded? 
See for some top h-index 
candidates. There is no reason to limit the calculation of h-index to 
Also, publications per year 
2007 1 
2006 3 (excludes text book) 
2005 2 
2004 2 
2003 10 
2002 7 
2001 4 
2000 6 
Web of Knowledge has many of the tools to do all these 'experiments' 

> Look at the publications before and after 2002 and calculate the h factor 

> This doesn't make sense. The h-factor is cumulative with your lifetime 
> publications. If you look at any subset of your life, even the most 
> fruitful subset, then the h-factor will probably be less for the 
> publications published in that period of time. 

> Phil 

> ________________________________ 
> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from 
> AOL at 

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat May 26 16:38:24 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 26 2007 - 16:38:24 EDT