From: Alexanian, Moorad <alexanian@uncw.edu>

Date: Thu May 10 2007 - 09:00:47 EDT

Date: Thu May 10 2007 - 09:00:47 EDT

I used Euclidean geometry since that is the more commonly known type. I could equally use non-Euclidean geometry that does apply to actual spacetime. The statements would be precisely the same. God is not in the mathematical model that describes Nature. However, Nature needs God for its existence, whether initially at creation or later to sustain that which He created.

Moorad

________________________________

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. [mailto:dfsiemensjr@juno.com]

Sent: Thu 5/10/2007 12:02 AM

To: Alexanian, Moorad

Cc: mrb22667@kansas.net; asa@calvin.edu

Subject: Re: [asa] David S Wilson

On Wed, 9 May 2007 23:21:49 -0400 "Alexanian, Moorad"

<alexanian@uncw.edu> writes:

*> One really does not need God to develop a logical system that
*

*> connects axioms to theorems. For instance, we do not need to invoke
*

*> God in Euclidian geometry. The latter, essentially, is what
*

*> mathematical models of Nature are. However, if one wants to explain
*

*> Euclid or the existence of the objects to which Euclidian geometry
*

*> is applied to, then that is a different problem where God needs to
*

*> be invoked since one is dealing with ontological questions.
*

*>
*

*>
*

*> Moorad
*

*>
*

You're missing the point that the Euclidean geometry is arbitrary. Euclid

himself did not present 5 axioms for his system: it was 5 postulates. His

separate axioms were matters like "equals added to equals are equal." One

may drop the parallel postulate and have absolute geometry, or add any

one of three parallel postulates and have Euclidean, Lobachevskian or

Riemannian geometries. None of these can be proved consistent, but only

that if any of them is consistent the others are also.

If you want to insist on Euclidean geometry, you're going to have a

problem with relativity. But those who think they can do away with

consistency will face /consequentia mirabilis/.

As to calling in the deity, I am persuaded that, involving Riemannian

notions, one can deal very well with relativity without need of that

hypothesis.

Dave

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with

"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.

Received on Thu May 10 09:01:29 2007

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Thu May 10 2007 - 09:01:29 EDT
*