Re: [asa] Demarcation was Re: thinking was prosecutors and not that of the judge

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. <dfsiemensjr@juno.com>
Date: Sun May 06 2007 - 00:15:19 EDT

This is technically a difference, but with his level of claimed
improbability I don't see that it makes an effective difference.
Dave

On Sat, 5 May 2007 16:28:53 -0700 PvM <pvm.pandas@gmail.com> writes:
> Dawkins argues that science cannot prove or disprove god but that it
> can show that it is improbable.
>
> On 5/5/07, D. F. Siemens, Jr. <dfsiemensjr@juno.com> wrote:
> > Rich,
> > I think you're mixing science with philosophy in trying to justify
> the ID
> > approach. The approach of Dawkins is that science proves that
> there is no
> > God. But it can't. IDers claim that science can prove that there
> is a
> > designer. But it can't.
>
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun May 6 00:32:21 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 06 2007 - 00:32:29 EDT