Re: [asa] Demarcation was Re: thinking was prosecutors and not that of the judge

From: PvM <pvm.pandas@gmail.com>
Date: Sat May 05 2007 - 19:28:53 EDT

Dawkins argues that science cannot prove or disprove god but that it
can show that it is improbable.

On 5/5/07, D. F. Siemens, Jr. <dfsiemensjr@juno.com> wrote:
> Rich,
> I think you're mixing science with philosophy in trying to justify the ID
> approach. The approach of Dawkins is that science proves that there is no
> God. But it can't. IDers claim that science can prove that there is a
> designer. But it can't.

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat May 5 19:29:14 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 05 2007 - 19:29:14 EDT