RE: [asa] Dawkins, religion, and children

From: Alexanian, Moorad <>
Date: Tue May 01 2007 - 17:04:58 EDT

I personally do not like the notion "what I believe is THE TRUTH." Given data, what prior information do you use to analyze the data? This is true whether the data is scientific or data that deals with the totality of human experience. I personally find the Christian faith more all encompassing than any other assumption. The truth or falseness of the faith cannot be ascertained.



From: on behalf of D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sent: Tue 5/1/2007 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: [asa] Dawkins, religion, and children

What I'm getting out of these many exchanges is that the philosophical
proofs do not prove anything about the deity. Similarly, the proofs from
history have been dismissed by many as legends. The insistence on
personal evidence may be attributed to wishful thinking, self-delusion,
childhood indoctrination, etc. Christians, however, are convinced that
they fellowship with God and live differently because of this. This is a
life of FAITH, so emphasized repeatedly. It is not an intellectual
demonstration, but a life of trust. So are other commitments.

The other side of much of this is the basic assumption on which human
beings commonly operate: what I believe is THE TRUTH. As Peirce noted,
while admitting that everyone errs, themselves included, they insist
"this time I'm right." I am certain of all this. ;-)

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue May 1 17:06:12 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 01 2007 - 17:06:12 EDT