Re: [asa] Subglacial Water System Moving Faster Than Previously Thought

From: PvM <>
Date: Mon Feb 19 2007 - 01:57:36 EST

I second Rich's concerns. It's one thing to reject policy based on
concerns, it's quite another to reject good science. Such a position
does a disservice to science, policy and faith. Janice has shown how
such a position can lead to much poorly supported arguments, flawed
logic and failure to do sufficient research.

So why could Janice not just state that she has a problem with the
Kyoto policy rather than having to embrace poorly supported
'scientific' claims. Would that not have been much simpler?
What am I missing?

On 2/18/07, Janice Matchett <> wrote:
> At 09:56 PM 2/18/2007, Rich Blinne wrote:
> Now I trust China about as far as I can throw it and their pollution control
> effectiveness so far has been poor. But, your issue is with others and not
> China itself. Everything points to the concern about climate change being
> genuine and not an oblique attempt at wealth transfer.
> @ Puhleeeeeeeeeeze!
> ~ Janice

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Feb 19 01:58:23 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 19 2007 - 01:58:24 EST