Re: [asa] IPCC

From: PvM <>
Date: Mon Feb 12 2007 - 03:52:02 EST

Yawn, yet another site that does not understand the science involved.
Let's be cautious about such 'independent' claims especially given
their history of being so called, self proclaimed skeptics.

Surely as Christians and Scientists we have to understand the sources
involved. Leave no stone unturned Janice, show us some of the
'arguments' which you are willing to support and we can establish
their relevance and accuracy.

In Christ

On 2/11/07, Janice Matchett <> wrote:

> I know the issue has been discussed quite enough as far as I can tell and
> I see no reason to question the main findings of the report. Still, for the
> sake of leaving no stone unturned, is there
> any way to get this "statement"? ... just so we know.
> @ I don't know about that "statement", but for the sake of leaving no
> stone unturned, I'll offer this below. :) ~ Janice

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Feb 12 03:52:59 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 12 2007 - 03:53:00 EST