Re: [asa] Why the opposition to global warming

From: Bill Hamilton <>
Date: Sat Feb 03 2007 - 20:05:10 EST

I agree with David. The scientists who are convinced that global warming is a
serious problem (and I agree with David that it is a problem) need to distance
themselves from the environmental movement, who have turned conservatives off
with their socialist, pantheistic and oppressive government ways. If they will
do that perhaps some intelligent discussion can take place, which will lead to
real solutions.

--- David Opderbeck <> wrote:

> We've discussed this before, but I think you need to understand the context
> of the environmental movement to answer this question. The environmental
> movement has made many doomsday predictions that have failed to materialize,
> the most notorious involving population control. Coupled with those
> predictions, some leaders in the environmental movement have operated from a
> neo-pantheistic worldview and have made suggestions that smack of
> totalitarianism -- again, population control being the most notorious
> example. And, as to warming in particular, the most prominent policy
> proposal, the Kyoto treaty, represents a massively costly global regulatory
> regime that impinges on state sovereignty and voter oversight -- thereby
> weakining some basic building blocks of democratic governance.
> So, among conservatives of any stripe -- not just fundamentalist religious
> conservatives, but also more serious economic and libertarian conservatives
> -- there is a deep suspicion of *any *suggestion that the world is facing an
> immanent, massive crisis that can be addressed only through world-wide
> regulation. Personally, I think at least some of that skepticism is a good
> thing, even if (as I believe) there is a very real problem that needs to be
> addressed in global warming. We need to find ways to address this problem
> without sacrificing freedom and liberty, and the libertarian skeptical
> voices at least remind us of that.
> On 2/3/07, Dave Wallace <> wrote:
> >
> > On your blog, Randy you ask "Why the opposition to global warming".
> > Late yesterday and again this morning the online version of the National
> > Post leads off with the headline
> >
> > The real deal?
> > Against the grain: Some scientists deny global warming exists.
> >
> > With the experts on climate change weighing in, the Post talks to
> > scientists who go against conventional...
> >
> > Further down they have:
> > # Global warming likely caused by humans
> > # Video: Suzuki reacts to climate report
> >
> >
> >
> > The National IMHO is Canada's best paper which is not saying a lot. We
> > used to have much better news papers, however, they have gone down hill
> > in the last ten to twenty years. Too many do not seem to be able to
> > tell the difference between news and editorials.
> >
> > The ten part series they write starts out at:
> >
> >
> >
> > If people read just the headlines let alone some of the lead articles
> > and the above series it appears that climate warming is not well
> > supported, at least the human causation factor. David Suzuki might
> > convince people otherwise, however, some people will say that if Suzuki
> > thinks global warming is real then it must be at best marginal or even a
> > hoax. IMHO he has cried wulf too many times.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to with
> > "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
> >
> --
> David W. Opderbeck
> Web:
> Blog:
> MySpace (Music):

Bill Hamilton
William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
248.652.4148 (home) 248.821.8156 (mobile)
"...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31

Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Feb 3 20:05:47 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Feb 03 2007 - 20:05:47 EST