Re: [asa] Denyse O'Leary and Darwinism

From: Michael Roberts <>
Date: Thu Dec 21 2006 - 14:16:20 EST

I had never read Uncouth Descent before and am appalled by it. Denyse needs
to go to some journalism classes to learn to write acceptable English, but
her science is beyond hope.

I went back for about a month's worth and my opinion of the whole ID
fraternity plummeted.



PS PZMyers is less offensive!
----- Original Message -----
From: "PvM" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:24 PM
Subject: [asa] Denyse O'Leary and Darwinism

> Denyse O'Leary, has written a poorly reasoned posting on UcD. While it
> is mostly based on her flawed understanding of Darwinism, it does have
> something of interest to ASA
> -------Begin Quote---------
> Why Christianity? Why not Islam? Well, for one thing, Muslims tend to
> actually respond to this kind of thing. Christians don't. There is an
> organization of Christians in science in the United States called
> American Scientific Affiliation, with about 2000 members, but they
> seem dedicated to ignoring these obvious affronts, and claiming to an
> increasingly restless public that there is no conflict between
> Darwinism and the traditional religions. Indeed, they have so far
> managed to ignore the fact that increasingly strident Darwinists claim
> that there is indeed such a conflict.
> I suspect that the key boffins at ASA would be inclined to blame those
> who openly question Darwinism for "causing" the atheist outbursts. In
> much the same way, under Marxist regimes, the churches that went along
> with Marxism used to blame traditional Christians who refused to do
> so, for bringing upon themselves the persecution they suffered at the
> hands of Marxists.
> Right now, the ASA is making much of genome mapper Francis Collins,
> whom I regard as an intellectual lightweight. I tried to say that in
> as nice a way as possible in my recent review of his book because he
> sounds like a really nice guy. If nice is all you need, he's your man.
> -------End Quote-------
> Let's just correct Denyse's obvious misconception that there is a
> conflict between Darwinism and traditional religions.
> Denyse, science and religion are traditionally not in conflict with
> eachother, unless one goes beyond the concept of science.
> Until Denyse familiarize herself with Darwinism, I can see why she may
> perceive that there is a conflict between science and her faith. An
> intellectual lightweight indeed.... Blame others but fail to take
> responsibility for her own ignorance about Darwinism.
> Sadly, intelligent design seems to be getting more and more extreme
> now that its foundations are crumbling. This is not good for science
> and quite detrimental to religious faith.
> To unsubscribe, send a message to with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Dec 21 14:18:35 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 21 2006 - 14:18:35 EST